If I Had A Vote and If I Could Vote for > 10

Hall of Fame announcements are set for January 9th on MLB Network and social media is always very abuzz with arguments over this guy and that guy, a lot of it PED-based this year. Every year we also get a glimpse into the BBWAA that maybe there are some people that don’t deserve their vote anymore, although I will say I very much appreciate the writers that are willing to talk about their votes, whether I agree with them or if I think they’re just a big knucklehead. What I’m going to write isn’t anything groundbreaking, in fact, I’d say the community I side with has set the path for me to see what they see. So, here’s my ballot, and though I hope the writers will be able to do this as well, I will vote for more than the allowed ten players.

My Ballot

  • Barry Bonds, LF — because a Hall of Fame would not be a HoF without Bonds (for those that are anti-PED, you will not like my ballot)
  • Roger Clemens, SP — possibly the greatest pitcher of our generation
  • Jeff Bagwell, 1B — I don’t care what you suspect
  • Craig Biggio, 2B/C/OF — numbers won’t blow you away like the first two guys, but he fits the mold
  • Curt Schilling, SP — even if he’s annoying in real life
  • Larry Walker, RF — could be least discussed candidate, and it’s all Coors Field’s fault or something
  • Alan Trammell, SS — never saw him play, and can’t understand why he’s been left out
  • Tim Raines, LF — definitely had the zoom
  • Kenny Lofton, CF — hope this guy gets the recognition he deserves
  • Edgar Martinez, DH — Sure, he might have done a lot of DH-ing, but he did it at a Hall of Fame level
  • Mike Piazza, C — For some reason I always crave pizza when I say his name
  • Rafael Palmeiro, 3B — not gonna lie, I hated writing his name down. Period.
  • Sammy Sosa, RF and Mark McGwire, 1B — I feel like these two belong together, but they were really tough choices. For me it was either both of them or neither of them, which is pretty dumb looking at the numbers, but I feel a very high emotional attachment to them. This must be how people feel about… (wait for it)

Not On My Ballot

  • Jack Morris, SP — Pitcher wins! Big game!
  • Dale Murphy, OF — look, I love nice guys and everything, but, even the character clause can do so much for your numbers
  • David Wells, SP — while lesser (physically and numerically) pitchers have gotten in than Wells, I’m not willing to put Boomer in
  • Don Mattingly, 1B — more for reasons of not measuring up than to reasons of loves to have his team bunt

There it is. Hate it, love it, whatever it. Chances are I will probably never have a HoF vote, and I’m sure there are plenty people that would be OK with that. Should be interesting to see how the real vote turns out, as no one being elected this year is a real possibility.

5 Comments

You’re right. I don’t like your ballot. No presumed roiders until we get confessions by the individual players, the union and Selig all. And, as a Cards fan, lifelong, and presumably older than you, I wouldn’t vote in Big Mac with less than 2K hits anyway. Take away some of the HRs and he’s Dave Kingman. Others? The Coors Field effect is real with Walker. My much more detailed analysis (is there some standard for being a “Top 100 MLB.com blog”? is here: http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/search/label/MLB%20Hall%20of%20Fame (that’s the link to my blog tag for HOF discussions).

Appreciate the read and the comment! Looked at your site and your article and I can tell we come from different philosophies of how entrance to the Hall should be handled, but I think both sides are worthy of discussion, even if at the end of the day we still don’t agree with one another.

As for the “Top 100″ thing, I’m really not sure — they did not give a step-by-step methodology for how they ranked the sites on the “mlblogs” platform. Could be a combination of site hits, followers, likes, etc. I just started in September of 2011, so I’m pretty new to the game, but I’m guessing the more you blog on the platform, the higher the chances are that you’ll get ranked (or get moved up in later years).

Love your ballot,and I think it’s a great argument for giving the voters more than 10 votes.

It’s going to be very interesting and possibly frustrating over the years I think to see other guys get voted in. This debate is going to be never ending for as long as baseball is around whether they get in or not. There is a right answer in my opinion and I think they shouldn’t get in. I don’t see why they should and I know they were such a big part of baseball history but it doesn’t seem fair to let them in. Really intrigued to see what happens over the next 5 to 10 years surrounding this. Also, you think you could check out my blog cuz I’d love to hear what you have to say http://chrisross91.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/hall-of-infamous/

Like the ballot. .I just wanted to say two things. I can’t vote for Palmeiro solely for the reason that he tested postive when the drug program was in place and was suspended. The other PED candidates who are on the ballot do not fall under this. Also I can’t see a vote for Schilling without a vote for Morris. I do feel that Schilling has better number especially in the postseason, but Morris had more wins as a career American Leaguer. I would be happy to hear what you have to say on my ballot: http://thegameofbaseball.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/my-hall-of-fame-ballot/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,656 other followers

%d bloggers like this: