Archive for the ‘ Baseball Statistics ’ Category

Each of Kershaw’s Game Line’s Against the Giants (2008-2015)

Clayton Kershaw is good. Studies have been done, scouts have been asked, fantasy players have benefitted from his performances, this is pretty much confirmed by now. Since you’re curious about how the possibly compromised Madison Bumgarner will do against the ace of the Dodgers. The embedding is admittedly a little messy since I haven’t been doing this for a while and I’m lucky I’m able to do this post while my kid is awake. Here are the lines from Kershaw’s appearances (2008 was a relief appearance) against the Giants. Not a lot to look forward to if you’re a fan of the Giants offense.

2008

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 28 @ SFG L,1-3 6-6 H(1) 3 1.0 2 0 1 0 0 0 4.26 5 13 5 0 0 1 3 2 0 0
107.2 109 51 52 100 11 1 4.26 470
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2009 — I’m pretty sure I was at this game. It was not a fun game for the Giants offense.

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Apr 15 SFG W,5-4 GS-7 5 7.0 1 1 1 13 1 0 1.50 22 105 63 14 17 0 8 0 1 0 83
171.0 119 53 91 185 7 1 2.79 701
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2010 — good every time, but Giants won the title

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 14 @ SFG W,1-0 SHO W(12-10) 6 9.0 4 0 0 4 0 0 2.85 30 111 72 21 8 14 12 2 4 0 83
Aug 1 @ SFG L,0-2 GS-7 L(10-6) 6 7.0 6 2 4 6 0 0 2.94 32 117 69 21 8 8 14 8 1 0 59
Jul 20 SFG L,5-7 GS-7 4 6.0 4 2 2 6 0 2 3.15 26 104 64 19 7 8 8 4 2 0 56
Apr 18 SFG W,2-1 GS-8 4 7.0 4 1 4 9 1 0 3.18 28 114 74 20 17 6 9 3 1 0 70
204.1 160 66 81 212 13 7 2.91 848
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2011 — one non-Kershaw start, but the others the Giants other three games had a combined 2 runs of offense

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 20 SFG W,2-1 GS-8 W(20-5) 5 7.1 6 1 2 6 1 0 2.27 28 115 75 19 11 10 10 1 2 0 66
Sep 9 @ SFG W,2-1 GS-8 W(18-5) 4 8.0 3 0 1 9 0 0 2.36 28 111 76 19 12 8 10 0 6 0 82
Jul 20 @ SFG W,1-0 GS-8 W(11-4) 4 8.0 3 0 1 12 0 0 2.72 29 112 70 19 14 8 8 4 2 0 87
May 18 SFG L,5-8 GS-5 4 5.0 7 4 1 6 0 0 3.09 23 85 54 17 9 7 9 4 1 0 42
Apr 11 @ SFG W,6-1 GS-7 W(2-1) 5 6.2 6 0 2 7 0 0 1.37 27 117 72 18 12 12 6 4 0 0 67
Mar 31 SFG W,2-1 GS-7 W(1-0) 99 7.0 4 0 1 9 0 0 0.00 26 96 65 20 11 9 7 0 2 0 77
233.1 174 59 54 248 15 3 2.28 912
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2012 — Kershaw was the Giants’ daddy

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Oct 3 SFG W,5-1 GS-8 W(14-9) 4 8.0 3 1 3 8 0 0 2.53 29 111 71 18 12 9 9 2 2 0 77
Aug 20 SFG L,1-2 GS-8 L(11-7) 4 8.0 6 2 0 10 0 0 2.87 29 109 81 25 16 8 11 4 3 0 72
Jul 29 @ SFG W,4-0 SHO W(8-6) 4 9.0 5 0 1 7 0 0 2.95 32 116 74 23 14 11 13 7 2 0 83
Jun 26 @ SFG L,0-2 GS-6 L(5-4) 4 6.0 8 2 2 8 1 0 2.74 28 104 65 18 10 5 13 7 1 0 54
May 8 SFG L,1-2 GS-8 L(2-1) 5 8.0 5 2 1 7 1 0 2.56 29 94 66 17 13 10 11 5 2 0 70
227.2 170 64 63 229 16 5 2.53 901
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2013 — average earned runs per start: 1.5. The Giants still managed to win two games.

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 13 SFG L,2-4 GS-7 L(14-9) 4 7.0 8 2 0 6 0 0 1.94 28 106 80 24 7 11 11 6 2 0 57
Jul 7 @ SFG W,4-1 GS-8 W(8-5) 4 8.0 3 1 1 3 0 1 1.89 28 100 68 12 8 10 13 7 1 0 74
Jun 26 SFG W,4-2 GS-9 W(6-5) 4 8.0 4 2 1 7 1 0 2.08 29 104 71 23 12 10 11 2 3 0 72
May 3 @ SFG L,1-2 GS-7 4 7.0 3 1 3 5 0 0 1.66 26 104 62 13 10 8 10 4 1 0 69
Apr 1 SFG W,4-0 SHO W(1-0) 99 9.0 4 0 0 7 0 0 0.00 30 94 65 23 12 12 11 4 4 0 86
236.0 164 48 52 232 11 3 1.83 908
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2014 — Kershaw allows three earned runs in May, gets beat. Otherwise, classic Kershaw.

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 24 SFG W,9-1 GS-8 W(21-3) 4 8.0 7 1 0 11 0 0 1.77 31 117 83 20 16 11 9 7 2 0 75
Sep 14 @ SFG W,4-2 GS-8 W(19-3) 5 8.0 7 2 1 9 0 0 1.70 31 110 78 12 18 10 11 7 2 0 68
Jul 26 @ SFG W,5-0 SHO W(12-2) 5 9.0 3 0 1 7 0 0 1.76 30 113 78 14 12 13 9 0 4 0 87
May 11 SFG L,4-7 GS-7 4 7.0 7 3 0 9 1 0 1.74 26 92 66 16 14 10 7 4 0 0 60
198.1 139 39 31 239 9 2 1.77 749
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2015 — Another non-Kershaw-type start in May, Giants post a winning record against Kershaw

Date Opp ▴ Rslt Inngs Dec DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB FB LD PU Unk GSc
Sep 29 @ SFG W,8-0 SHO W(16-7) 4 9.0 1 0 1 13 0 0 2.16 29 104 73 16 17 4 11 5 1 0 97
Sep 2 SFG W,2-1 CG W(12-6) 4 9.0 6 1 1 15 0 0 2.18 32 132 95 20 32 7 9 5 1 0 85
May 21 @ SFG L,0-4 GS-8 L(2-3) 5 7.1 7 4 2 7 1 1 4.32 31 99 67 17 13 10 11 7 1 0 53
Apr 28 SFG L,1-2 GS-7 L(1-2) 5 7.0 7 2 0 8 1 0 3.73 27 92 66 15 15 12 7 3 1 0 63
Apr 22 @ SFG L,2-3 GS-6 4 6.0 3 2 1 9 0 0 4.07 21 93 64 18 9 5 6 3 0 0 66
232.2 163 55 42 301 15 5 2.13 890
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

2016 — clearly the pattern is the Giants will go undefeated against Kershaw, scoring 1 or 2 runs in every other start except for May, where he will allow 4 runs.

Can’t wait.

 

Pavs: Brandon Belt’s going to be a Giant for this year and five more years

Well, that was quite the game. Dodgers lose their no-hitter, and then Joe Blanton had trouble not staring into Brandon Crawford’s eyes, and boom, game over, drive home safely, baseball fans. Not even five minutes after the Giants and their fans were doing cannonballs into the puddles from the rain, delirious from their happiness, CSN Bay Area’s Alex Pavlovic tweeted out the breaking news that the Giants and Brandon Belt have agreed to a five-year extension that also reworks the money from this year. This means that in the 2021 season, you’ll be wondering what the Giants plan to do with Brandon Belt: keep him for a couple more seasons, or give the job to super-prospect Emilio Anderson, drafted in the 8th round of the 2019 Draft.

In case you’re wondering what the Giants are keeping:

Year Age G PA H 2B 3B HR SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+
2011 23 63 209 42 6 1 9 3 2 20 57 .225 .306 .412 103
2012 24 145 472 113 27 6 7 12 2 54 106 .275 .360 .421 123
2013 25 150 571 147 39 4 17 5 2 52 125 .289 .360 .481 139
2014 26 61 235 52 8 0 12 3 1 18 64 .243 .306 .449 114
2015 27 137 556 138 33 5 18 9 3 56 147 .280 .356 .478 129
2016 28 4 18 5 3 0 0 0 2 4 1 .357 .500 .571 179
6 Yrs 560 2061 497 116 16 63 32 12 204 500 .272 .349 .456 126
162 Game Avg. 162 596 144 34 5 18 9 3 59 145 .272 .349 .456 126
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 4/8/2016.

 

Certainly, there has been some disappointment from fans that Brandon Belt hasn’t kept up with Diamondbacks star Paul Goldschmidt, but as the Giants have shown, having around a .350 OBP, potentially 20-HR player that plays some pretty good defense is pretty good to keep around. From 2012 to 2016, Belt is 11th in fWAR among all that have played, higher than notables such as Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, but lower than any superstar first baseman you can think of that’s kind of young.

I have been on the Pro-Belt side for quite some time, annoyingly so probably. I was not Pro-Belt before it was cool to be Pro-Belt, or maybe I was. Who cares. Anyway, we don’t know the money going to Belt, but I trust management that it’s reasonable. Good job, Giants.

Yesterday’s news today: Tim Hudson, NL All-Star

Madison Bumgarner pitched on Sunday, so that opened the door for another player to be put on to the NL All Star roster so they would be available to pitch for the National League squad. Manager Bruce Bochy and all Giants players and probably all Giants fans hoped that Tim Hudson would be that player to replace Bumgarner, and so it was.

Also of note is that today is Tim Hudson’s 39th birthday. As John Shea notes, Hudson was an All Star twice with the A’s, once with the Braves, and in his first season with the Giants.  

Hudson is top-20 in MLB in ERA (2.87), top-40 in innings pitched (119.1), is 22nd in FIP (3.22), and is also fourth in the majors in ground-ball percentage among qualified starters (56.8%). Hudson started the season off so strong, whispers of a Cy Young award were being made around Giants circles, but since those first couple months, Hudson has shown his human side.

Split ERA GS IP H ER HR BB SO HBP WP BF WHIP SO9 SO/W
April/March 2.17 6 45.2 32 11 3 2 31 1 1 170 0.745 6.1 15.50
May 1.46 4 24.2 24 4 1 4 13 2 0 101 1.135 4.7 3.25
June 3.86 6 37.1 44 16 2 10 26 2 1 164 1.446 6.3 2.60
July 5.56 2 11.1 12 7 1 3 8 0 0 47 1.324 6.4 2.67
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 7/14/2014.

While we all wish that 31/2 strikeout-to-walk ratio never would have left, we know that Hudson is more of a two-to-one K/BB pitcher than a 15.5/1. Even his June and July are a little higher than his career average, although they would not be an outlier were they to be season-to-season data points. Here’s how opposing hitters have done against Hudson so far this year (via BrooksBaseball.net):

Screen Shot 2014-07-14 at 9.25.44 AM

While his four-seam fastball may not be fooling hitters, his sinker is still doing the job and his other pitches are doing enough to fool hitters, though the BABIP on those other pitches do not suggest the same quality of the pitch that his sinker is.

Hudson joins a loaded National League rotation that includes Clayton Kershaw, Adam Wainwright, Jordan Zimmermann, Zack Greinke and a handful of solid relievers. If Kershaw and Wainwright give the NL squad two innings a piece, I’d expect Hudson to get one inning at the most. Manager Bruce Bochy has said that if Hudson doesn’t have a long outing in the All Star game, he’ll be slotted to be #2 in the rotation upon return from the All Star Break.

The All Star Game begins airing at 4:30 PM PST on FOX.

The June Small Sample Size Show: The Giants bench players that are doing well, ok, and oh my gosh what why how

We can talk about the slide the San Francisco Giants are on, or we can look at individual performances that involve sample sizes that are way too small to project anything going forward in this post. I’m going to choose the latter because the former is a tired subject that makes me want to only pay attention to soccer and how the Dodgers are doing. Due to the injuries of Marco Scutaro, Brandon Belt, and the off-and-on-ness of Angel Pagan, the Giants bench has had to do more than its fair share of work. I think the good people of the world have figured out that Juan Perez, Brandon Hicks, Ehire Adrianza, Joaquin Arias, Hector Sanchez, Tyler Colvin, and Gregor Blanco are not meant to be full-time starters, but are better suited for back-up roles when they’re at their best. The best of the bunch is probably Blanco and he can have his stable moments, but big picture, bench player. In June, each has been able to contribute to at least a few games, so while I was playing with some spreadsheets I thought I’d share some of the numbers I found on June’s offensive production for these gentlemen and divide them into good performances, acceptable for a bench player, and being in the region for many fans calling for your demotion. You likely already know about Hicks, and possibly Blanco, but what about the other four?

The Good Bench Performances in June

In eighteen plate appearances, Juan Perez has done enough to stay, collecting two doubles and even hitting a home run (proof below that it happened) that are driving up his wOBA to an acceptable .359. His 38.9% K% is more along the lines of what we’d expect from him, and he also has zero walks in his few chances.

Gregor Blanco has had the lion’s share of starts in Pagan’s absence, and this month, he’s held his own with a .380 OBP, .349 wOBA, and three extra base hits. A wRC+ of 127 is cool, too, but please come back soon, Pagan.

Ehire Adrianza in twenty-seven plate appearances has been decent this month, despite collecting only one extra base hit, his wOBA is at .343, has his OBP is at .407. His ground ball percentage is 28.6% for the month and his K% is 11.1%, so we’ll see which one of those two is less sustainable (not that the other numbers are not sustainable).

The Acceptable Bench Performances in June

Joaquin Arias, who has an overall wRC+ of five this season, Arias has a wRC+ of 94 in June, a .350 OBP, and a .302 wOBA in twenty-plate appearances. There are some good numbers that come up, but for June, I’d say this is about what you would realistically hope to get out of a bench player.

Tyler Colvin I think is on the tail end of “acceptable” here, with a .290 OBP, .282 wOBA, and an 81 wRC+ with a couple extra base hits. If you wanted to say this wasn’t good enough to be in this tier, I wouldn’t blame you. He’s a bench player, and even though he’s making seven figures (an even one million dollars, Dr. Evil), you could do worse.

The June Swooners on the Bench

As long as Andrew Susac is in the minors and Brandon Belt is on the roster, Hector Sanchez will get playing time with Buster Posey getting his occasional time at first base with Tim Lincecum on the mound. Don’t get me wrong, Sanchez is a good back-up, I’d rather have him than other back-ups that the Giants have had in the past. However, June hasn’t been kind for Sanchez in the form of a .233 OBP, .237 wOBA, 50 wRC+ and a 30% K%, along with plenty of foul tips to the mask that are undoubtedly causing concern.

Brandon Hicks. A 38% K%, the .140 AVG in June has your attention, a .226 wOBA and 42 wRC+ also have some people impatiently tapping their foot and crossing their arms waiting for a move to replace Hicks. His April was something unexpected, but then he regressed to the Hicks that teams probably knew all along about. In all likelihood, the lightning has been used up, and especially in the midst of a losing spell, Giants fans don’t want to wait around to see if there’s any more left.

For those interested, I used this chart to help me organize my thoughts. Thank you, Fangraphs.

The Giants continue their series with the Diamondbacks today at 7:10 PM PST.

Postseason Probabilities: #SFGiants have highest percentage in MLB, #Dodgers second-highest in the NL

A day after the San Francisco Giants got spanked by the Washington Nationals 9-2, the Giants look to recover as their rotation starts at the top again with Madison Bumgarner. Big picture, the Giants still lead the National League West by 8.5 games after the Dodgers beat the Reds in Cincinnati last night and continue to own the best record in the Majors. Of late, the Giants have feasted on the likes of the Twins, Cubs, Mets, Reds, and even took three out of four from the Cardinals, going a smooth 13-3 in that span. No wonder everything has felt so good lately. Plus, Brandon Belt and Santiago Casilla could be beginning a rehab assignment as early as Wednesday in San Jose, which looks to help the roster in a time when there is little panic over the spots they left vacant. According to the Postseason Probabilities page powered by Baseball Prospectus, the Giants are also looking good to make the playoffs, even if there are ninety-eight games left to play.

Screen Shot 2014-06-10 at 7.04.46 AM

To me, it is amazing that the Dodgers, despite being 8.5 games back of the Giants, still have an 81.5% chance to play in the postseason, being only three games above .500. However, 60% of that probably comes from them making it as a Wild Card team, while 78% of the Giants postseason probability comes from winning the NL West. Colorado has tanked to single digits and being 12.5 back, as San Diego and Arizona also continue to dwell in the cellar. As it stands right now, there are six teams that hold a 50% or greater chance to make the playoffs, and as you see from the (probably blurry) screen shot, they are:

San Francisco (42-22) — 97.5%

Los Angeles (34-31) — 81.4%

Washington (33-29) — 76%

Milwaukee (38-26) — 68.6%

St. Louis (33-31) — 65.4%

Atlanta (33-29) — 55.2%

Everybody else has less than a 16% chance of making the playoffs. There is little love for the Miami Marlins (33-30), 0.5 games back of the Braves and Nationals, 10.5% of making the postseason. If you’re looking ahead to when the Giants play these teams that could be contending, these would be the number of games left against the teams and the dates:

Los Angeles (9) — July 25th-27th, September 12th-14th, 22nd-24th

Washington (5) — Yesterday through tomorrow, August 22nd-24th,

Milwaukee (6) — August 5th-7th, 29th-31st

St. Louis (3) — July 1st-3rd

Atlanta (0)

Miami (3) — July 18th-20th

Total that up, and that’s twenty-six of the remaining eighty-four games (31.0%) against NL teams that are looking like they have a reasonable shot to make the postseason (they have fourteen interleague games against the likes of Oakland, Kansas City, ChiSox, and Detroit). That is indeed favorable scheduling for the Giants, and if they keep winning the series that they should be winning, they’ll be looking good for a place in the October limelight.

As with the National League, the top two probabilities in the American League belong to two Western division teams: the A’s (39-25, 93.6%) and the Angels (35-28, 82.1%). Can you imagine four California teams being in the playoffs, and what about if there were an A’s-Angels, Dodgers-Giants NLDS? California would be buzzing.

It’s OK to still be worried about the Dodgers

In 2013, the Dodgers were 9.5 games back on June 22nd, 2013 and still won the West by 11 games. The arrival of Yasiel Puig helped, but it wasn’t the only helping factor as Hanley Ramirez exploded and the Dodgers pulled off two consecutive six-loss months in July and August for a combined 42-12 (77.8 win%). That they had a 12-15 record in September tells you about how the NL West finally decided it wasn’t going to let the Think Blue crowd push them around. To repeat, the Dodgers went 12-15 in September and still finished up 11.0 games on the West. The Giants had 76 wins and finished in fourth, a whole 16.0 games back. On paper, the Dodgers have a lineup worth being scared of, and a 1-2-3 punch that makes you understand why Dodger fans dream large if this team makes the postseason.

The Dodgers starters are putting just about the same number of innings the Giants starters are, striking out about the same percentage, walking fewer players, getting ahead of players better, and the list goes on what a good rotation like that can do. Their offense has better OBP, wOBA, wRC+ numbers, but don’t have the same numbers the Giants do with RISP and 2 outs. Their defense has speed on their side, but hasn’t been able to post the overall numbers of converting fly balls and ground balls to outs like the Giants have, and have a middle of the road BABIP against. Their bullpen hasn’t been as lights out as I thought they could be, walking a bottom-five ratio while the Giants bullpen has walked the lowest. There are a lot of things that the Giants doing right, but it’s not like the Dodgers are pooping the bed every which way.

If you want to attribute it to chemistry, you can, but I’m not sure that just because the Yes! Movement is popular in San Francisco and not in Los Angeles it describes the ten-loss difference between the Giants and Dodgers. I doubt chemistry is the thing that’s knocking two out hits, that made Saturday night’s walk-off happen for the Giants. It’s not the reason Dee Gordon or Yasiel Puig are day-to-day, the reason for Brian Wilson being awful, why Matt Kemp was injured and why Carl Crawford is injured, nor is it the reason Clayton Kershaw had to take some starts off or why Bruce Bochy‘s in-game strategy is what it is. The Giants are playing great, and unless the Dodgers implode on all levels, they are still a legitimate threat to the Giants. There are still 100 games left for the Giants, after all. The Giants can go 50-50 and if the Dodgers hit 92 wins and go 60-39 in that span they win the West.

I’m waiting for the Dodgers to use their resources and options, internally and externally to field a more competitive club (because we know they have them), and perhaps get a little luckier in the process, netting more wins. They’re better than a one-game over-.500 club. The distance between the Dodgers and Giants is great, but not insurmountable. The Giants are looking like a team on a mission to setting a San Francisco record for wins, and this is looking like it might be a pretty fun ride. If it keeps up, I say no worries. But if it doesn’t, well, don’t think those Dodgers can’t make up ground.

The #SFGiants are tops in getting batted ball ground ball outs (courtesy of @msimonespn)

The San Francisco Giants have a 40-21 record, the best in the major leagues. Listening to other broadcasts, sometimes the praise that has fallen on the Giants is that they play solid, fundamental baseball. Part of that will be on the defensive side where the batted balls that come your way will turn into outs. Mark Simon of ESPN put out some tweets this morning that shows how the teams rank in terms of percentage of ground balls and fall balls turning into outs. These rankings do not necessarily make one team’s defense the best, but gives some reason into why the teams with good records have arrived at that spot.

When I look at the numbers and see the people at the top or bottom, I look to see if they are a huge outlier from the group, and I don’t consider the A’s and Giants lead on the rest of the lead “huge.” I don’t know how these stats compare to years past, so it’s hard to say if these ratios are sustainable. I wonder how much better the Marlins would be if their GB% rate to outs rate was closer to the middle of the pack? In this next tweet, it looks like the team of Brandon Hicks, Brandon Belt, Buster Posey, and Michael Morse have helped lead the Giants to the top:

Those numbers should be higher since the distance to assist the putouts are shorter than what Brandon Crawford and Pablo Sandoval. That chart also covers bunts and swinging bunts, so Buster Posey, Hector Sanchez, and the pitchers have helped out there as well. That the Giants are so far ahead the pack there and were second overall, it stands to reason that their percentage on this next chart will be lower, but they’re still in the top five:

Thought that the combination of Troy Tulowitzki and Nolan Arenado would garner a higher percentage, or at least a higher place on that list. Mr. Mark Simon also posted about balls in the air. The Giants are just at the end of the middle third in this ranking:

The Minnesota Twins have given up the most non-HR fly balls at 976 while the Pirates have given up the fewest at 776. The Giants are at 806.

As for what the advanced metrics say, overall the Giants appear to be a good team on defense, being top three in Defensive Runs Saved and top half in UZR/150. The Giants and A’s also have the three lowest BABIP-against numbers in baseball. So it may be that the metrics are suggesting the Giants might be over-achieving a little bit as their range may not be reflecting their out rates, but at the very least, the numbers help describe why so few runs have been scored against the Giants in 2014, allowing the offense to do their work, leading the Giants to their MLB-leading 40-21 record.

Arbitrary Endpoint Theater: The Ryan Vogelsong Numbers Before/After April 23rd

This season, there have been two Ryan Vogelsongs: there’s been the one that started the season allowing hits and runs with relatively few ground balls, then there’s the other one that’s had a higher number of swinging strikes, more ground balls, and more outings where he’s completed at least six innings. The game logs and stats from his first four starts look like this:

Rk Date Opp Rslt DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB GSc
1 Apr 4 @ LAD W,8-4 99 4.0 7 4 2 4 2 0 9.00 21 94 54 24 4 2 34
2 Apr 10 ARI L,5-6 5 5.0 7 4 1 5 0 2 8.00 24 93 59 21 4 4 41
3 Apr 16 LAD W,2-1 5 6.0 4 1 2 2 0 1 5.40 22 83 48 9 8 7 60
4 Apr 21 @ COL L,2-8 4 1.1 6 5 3 0 3 0 7.71 13 59 32 10 1 2 19
56.1 51 20 19 46 5 4 3.20 236
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 5/25/2014.

He put it together a little bit just in time for the Giants to beat LA, but outside of that, believers were left scratching their heads and the critics were calling for Edwin Escobar, ready or not, or even Yusmeiro Petit. Looking at his performance card on Brooks Baseball, it seemed like he couldn’t rely on a pitch to get him an out. Amazing how explosive hitters were against his changeup:

Screen Shot 2014-05-25 at 8.35.20 AM

After the adjustment to whatever movement it was in his legs Vogey reportedly noticed in Colorado, Vogelsong’s performance has been that of the vintage re-born Ryan Vogelsong. Take a look:

Rk Date Opp Rslt DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB GSc
5 Apr 27 CLE W,4-1 5 7.0 2 0 2 6 0 0 5.40 24 104 59 13 15 8 77
May Opp Rslt DR IP H ER BB SO HR HBP ERA BF Pit Str StL StS GB GSc
6 May 3 @ ATL W,3-1 5 6.0 5 1 4 6 0 0 4.60 26 107 64 19 13 6 60
7 May 8 @ LAD W,3-1 4 7.1 5 1 2 2 0 0 3.93 27 104 64 14 6 12 64
8 May 13 ATL L,0-5 4 6.0 7 4 1 8 0 0 4.22 26 96 58 15 12 6 49
9 May 18 MIA W,4-1 4 7.0 5 0 1 6 0 1 3.62 27 98 62 21 8 12 72
10 May 24 MIN W,2-1 5 6.2 3 0 1 7 0 0 3.20 26 107 68 26 7 6 74
56.1 51 20 19 46 5 4 3.20 236
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 5/25/2014.

Screen Shot 2014-05-25 at 8.47.33 AM

Every outing he’s gone at least six innings, getting more swinging strikes, and a higher rate of ground balls. His lone bad start against Atlanta saw him lose his focus when his defense let him down, and that’s not to put the blame of his defense that should have made plays, Vogey also should have kept his focus to limit the damage. Referring to the screen shot, Vogelsong has allowed four extra base hits in his last six starts, compared with the fourteen in his first four. The batting average against for those pitches also look much better, with the two-seamer actually performing about the same. Now, if a player were to not report making adjustments, we’d all wonder what’s coming next in terms of not if, but when Vogelsong were going to regress back to the form of his earlier starts. We are at a point now where we consider what adjustments hitters will make to him, and how will the #5 SP respond to those, which is the best problem to have in terms of speculating about a player.

More Looks at the MLBAM Player Tracking System via MLB.com and I’m So Excited

MLB Network’s Brian Kenny, Jim Duquette, John Smoltz, and Ken Rosenthal took a three-and-a-half minute look at the MLB Advanced Media player tracking system that is already being tested in Miller Park, Target Field, and Citi Field. I cannot wait until this gets put into full effect at all thirty yards and we get an even better understanding of many of the subtleties of the game.

Early on, some of the crowd against this argued that the numbers were too much, that they didn’t need to know this, or it was too much on the screen at one time. In an age of people wanting to know everything and anything they can get their hands on, I have a hard time seeing that crowd against all the numbers getting their way. Some of the specifics I am especially excited to see include: distance a runner or fielder is from a base, a catcher’s pop time and velocity on their throws, route efficiency, and the batted ball’s speed off the bat. What are you most excited about?

 

 

Postseason Probabilities: #SFGiants Have 2nd Highest % in the Majors, Current NL West Contender More Than 50% Behind

Coming into Thursday’s action, the Giants are a win better than the Milwaukee Brewers for the best record in the National League at 26-15. A good place for you to use some of your off time is the Postseason Probabilities page on MLB.com, numbers courtesy of Baseball Prospectus. Boy, I’ve been linking a lot to BP lately. Anyway, their explanation on the calculation goes as such:

“Postseason probabilities are courtesy of Baseball Prospectus and indicate each team’s probability of winning the division or wild card, or any postseason berth. Probabilities are based on thousands of Monte Carlo simulations of the remaining season schedule incorporating each team’s year-to-date run differential, current roster composition, playing time projections and remaining schedule.”

Most important part of this is that these probabilities aren’t just water cooler talk of a couple dudes saying that they think Team A has a 75% chance of making it and Team B has a 50%, although run differential may not be the best way to analyze a team, we know it isn’t all that is used. Of course there’s a margin for error, and injuries could change things in a hurry, and also, it’s May 15th. If you haven’t clicked the link to see what the screen looks like, here’s an idea:

Screen Shot 2014-05-15 at 7.38.58 AM

You’ll notice that despite the Giants being 4.5 games better than the third-place Dodgers, the Dodgers are given a better chance to win the NL West by 1% (46.3-45.3) over the Giants. After Thursday’s games is the first time the Giants have had a better chance of making the Postseason than the Dodgers. A combination of 117 Giants wins and Rockies losses will get the Giants to clinch the NL West, another indicator it’s way too early for this kind of stuff, but still fun. Also, the second-place Rockies are about 30% to make the playoffs, so the system doesn’t have much faith in them thus far.

Overall, the Giants have the second-best Postseason probability of any team in the Majors, trailing only to the Detroit Tigers, who own a 92% chance of playing past the regular season. Other notables include Oakland at 74%, Milwaukee at 60%, Yankees at 43%, D-Backs at 2%, and Houston at 0%. Poor Houston.

The Giants begin a four-game series against the Marlins (6%) on Thursday night. The Giants just took two of three from the Braves (53%), while the Marlins were able to salvage the last game of their three-gamer against the Dodgers (82.6%).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,785 other followers